Return
to the dogma that got the party started in the first place. Whether
those golden words will obscure what is perceived of economic
reality, or not, is another matter. At the end of the day It's still
playing with fire when you are now a market economy, management team,
more than a cadre of revolutionaries filled with revolutionary
spirit.
The
problem they face, however, is that the peasant born collectivist
fervor that brought the Communist part to power may still be out
there; festering among the majority who still haven't gotten the full
benefit of modernization. And remember, this is a majority that has
had to endure an array of mass relocation’s, industry disasters,
and growing pollution that was suppose to lift all boats. Arbitrary
decrees of power that all too often benefit corrupt local officials,
but helped the farmers, and cottage industries very little.
The
problem we face is that what happens to the Chinese will affect us as
well, whether we like it or not. Instability there is indirect
instability here. Simply put it would be a disaster for us, as well
as the rest of the world, if they fell into another cultural
revolution. And how we react to this is of utmost importance.
First
and foremost is that we cannot afford to indulge in any more of our
usual condescending criticisms. Simply demanding that they open their
markets, or institute democratic reforms will only make matters
worse. The fact of the matter is that we have our own forms of
corruption, restricted information flow, and economic injustice. The
moral high ground is not ours to be preaching from here at all.
What
we do need to be doing is to start looking for ways to build common
ground. And chief among those would be to recognize that cost based,
market economies, are inherently flawed; especially in as much as
ever increasing competition for various markets, as well as the
resources that fuel them, is no longer serving any of us very well.
And we can approach this not from the tired old nostrums of
collectivism in the Soviet mold, but from the technological reality
that Capitalism was never intended to operate in an electrified
information environment.
This
would be where we use collaborative efforts to solve common problems,
and setting aside for the moment that each of us conducts politics in
quite different ways. And in this we have to be honest about what
actually is; as in the fact that they stem from a completely
different culture than we do; as in the fact that our supposed
"Democracy," though mostly a very good thing for us,
despite the obvious problems it has, is not necessarily an approach
that would be good for them.
I
have already mentioned in other posts that energy would be a good
place to start; especially if we could take money for more arms to do
it. Collaborative space exploration (see the movie "The
Martian") is another. The bottom line, however, must be the
realization that collaborative economics, as opposed to the current
competitive mode, is absolutely mandatory if we are to avoid
internally driven, or externally driven, disasters. Everything is
connected now. Everything. Conflict anywhere all too soon becomes
conflict everywhere. The Chinese people are not our enemies. Old ways
of doing things that do not work any more are.
No comments:
Post a Comment